Search for: "People v. Adams (1988)" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
Showing football matches in pubs was also touched upon, in the form of FAPL v Luxton (use of Danish domestic satellite card for commercial rather than domestic purposes) and QC Leisure.The use of copyright material for personal purposes was reviewed in the form of the CJEU ruling in ACI Adam, plus a review of the new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section 28B exceptions. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
First, in deciding whether the claim was scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious, Master Bell considered the evidence adduced at the Plaintiff’s criminal trial for the shooting of Mr Adams in 1987, and Lord Lowry’s judgment of April 1988. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
He did not dispute that Ms Kogan – an opera singer with a raft of other creative projects under her belt – had introduced him to the FFJ story, but was adamant that he alone wrote the script. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There’s mere wordplay to say that photos are transformed from documentation of wedding to confirmation of text saying people are married.Then there’s White v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]