Search for: "People v. Agnew" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
  The relevant briefs and memoranda are: The Sept. 24, 1973, OLC Dixon memo The Oct. 5, 1973, brief for the United States in In re Agnew The Feb. 12, 1974, memorandum to Independent Counsel Leon Jaworski The June 21, 1974, reply brief for the United States in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Dominic Chambers QC will conclude his submissions on behalf of the second respondent, Dos Santos, before handing over to the barristers representing the applicants in the Northern Ireland proceedings – Agnew and others and McCord. 13:04: In response to the Appellant saying he does not [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Progress, however, has been interrupted.In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
More and more people have awoken from their Orwellian slumbers. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]