Search for: "People v. Anderson (1975)" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
  In May, 2010, wedding food also hospitalized at least one hundred people in Northern India. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
  Thus he has authored what sadly remains the Supreme Court’s last serious effort to check the two major political parties’ anticompetitive impulses, Anderson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:31 am
The First Department, citing People v Reason, 37 NY2d 351 [1975], stated that this was not a proper basis upon which to deny the defendant's request. [read post]