Search for: "People v. Andrews" Results 121 - 140 of 2,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
As Europeans, we would like to rejoice at the prospect of witnessing the EU progressing towards an “ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” with a unified patent law under a unitary title and  a jurisdiction with transnational competence for patent litigation. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
She struck out the claim by Andrew Prismall, acting as a Representative Claimant on behalf of about 1.6 million people, and entered summary judgment for the Defendants, Google UK Limited and DeepMind Technologies Ltd. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  The defamation claim was brought by Andrew Bridgen MP against former health minister, Matt Hancock MP. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Andrew Hyman, one of the advocates of this position whom I criticized, has sent me the following response, which I am posting at his request. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
Several ill people reported the same restaurants, indicating possible clusters. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The disposal hearing followed an order by Sir Andrew Nicol, dated 22 October 2021 striking out the defence filed by each defendant and ordering judgement for the claimant. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
  The original decision was made by the President of the Family Division Sir Andrew MacFarlane (see Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWHC 1699 (Fam), [2022] 1 FLR 348). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
The latter prong of the investigation led to the Supreme Court case Trump v. [read post]