Search for: "People v. Angell" Results 61 - 80 of 2,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2013, 10:06 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Moreover, the Project adversely impacts the goal of regionalization which is a centerpiece of the Stipulated Settlement signed by the Petitioners in City of El Segundo, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
 But Los Angeles area residents can't get their weed via delivery. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:13 am by Nassiri Law
’S MILLENNIALS WORK CRAPPY JOBS, October 1, 2015, LA Weekly, by Dennis Romero More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Officers in a helicopter tracked the Sebring using a powerful magnifying camera, which enabled them to see people on the ground from an altitude of 6,500 to 8,000 feet. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm by Eric Lipman
The Los Angeles Times is reporting today that the felony menacing charges brought last week against Charlie Sheen -- who apparently is not a member of the Brat Pack -- might impact the continued viability of the inexplicably highest rated sitcom on TV, "Two and A Half Men. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
 No one -- neither the prisoners nor prison officials -- want mortal enemies sharing a cell.But I didn't realize the full extent of it.For example, here, in Monterey County, there are separate portions of the jail -- separate dorms -- for (1) people who do not associate with gangs (i.e., people like you and me); (2) Norteno gang members and associates; (3) Sureno gang members and associates (the Norteno and Sureno gangs are the largest in California, and are enemies); and (4)… [read post]
15 May 2010, 10:23 pm by Tung Yin
  Except for some people, who experienced no vision at all, suggesting that they're dead in six months. [read post]
5 May 2013, 2:51 pm by Barry Barnett
You'll note that the case Liptak uses to kick off the article, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
(Donn Logan et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents) (Boren, J., assigned justice pro tempore)(3) S093235 People v. [read post]