Search for: "People v. Appellate Department (1996)"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
The Fourth Department last cited Delgado as a basis for reducing a negotiated sentence in 1996 in People v Sanchez (225 AD2d 1085 [4th Dept 1996]), in which the Court reduced a negotiated sentence from 8 1/3 year to life to 3 years to life. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
I concluded by noting that the Fourth Department last cited Delgado as a basis for reducing a negotiated sentence in 1996 in People v Sanchez (225 AD2d 1085 [4th Dept 1996]), in which the Court reduced a negotiated sentence from 8 1/3 year to life to 3 years to life. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
No. 2000-03919 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff 2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff 2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
In Westfall v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:12 pm
In 1996, some boys found an ancient human skeleton in the mud flats of the Columbia River near Kennewick, Washington. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
And in the recent Fourth Department decision, People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
Department of Justice, Civil Division, has filed its motion to dismiss in Gill v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm
Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [not on bailii yet, we've seen a transcript] When a Local Authority accepts the applicant’s case on a review under s.202 review under Housing Act 1996, is there or should there be a duty to give reasons why the applicant was successful and on what objections they were not successful? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
Hearing Details Gill et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
Whren, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) and People v. [read post]
