Search for: "People v. Arnold"
Results 201 - 220
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Days after the sixth episode of FX’s new documentary about The People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
The Court held, after an excursus on contractual interpretation after Arnold v Britton, and on the findings in Lambeth v Thomas and Rochdale v Dixon, that this was not an agency agreement and that Southwark were indeed ‘the customer’. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
Arnold, 280 Ga. 487, 489(5), 629 S.E.2d 807 (Georgia Supreme Court 2006) (citations and punctuation omitted).Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
John Arnold founded Centaurus Advisors with his last bonus from Enron – ~$8 million. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
John Arnold founded Centaurus Advisors with his last bonus from Enron – ~$8 million. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Nothing much happened until 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
– yes, indigenous people! [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
McGee v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:37 am
Ronald Dean Arnold Malvitz challenged the language of the Vehicle Code in the 1992 case of People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
The Art of the Family Law and Divorce Objections: Evidence and Procedure in California Family Law Proceedings and RFO Requests By: Michael C. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some people think that the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) is not working properly. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
A very belated (and brief) note on Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36, as I have just realised we didn’t cover it. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Just think of the forthcoming Batman v Superman ... [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:04 pm
The current case is Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
Apologia obscures accountability on Sandra Bland deathRead the Austin Statesman's Ken Herman on "What white people think about Sandra Bland" "Cops hands not bloodless but Sandra Bland not murdered. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am
As such shapes can be protected through intellectual property law, but whether Kit Kat's design is truly distinctive enough to be protected as a trade mark, has been a contested question here in the UK for several years, ultimately being referred to the European Court of Justice by Justice Arnold nearly two years ago in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd (UK High Court of Chancery). [read post]
