Search for: "People v. Ash" Results 161 - 180 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  Indeed, a patent to refine potash into pearl ash, which is basically pure potassium carbonate, was patent no. 1 (now X1) issued by the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Turned to the NY legislature, with support from Al Pacino, Martin Sheen, Arthur Ashe estate. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
  People queued and camped to get their hands on these devices. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am by INFORRM
It was an argument that was tried and failed in McKennitt v Ash. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]