Search for: "People v. Atkins" Results 81 - 100 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by David Markus
Georgia in 1976, to  deeming it “cruel and unusual” — and thus banned by the Constitution — for people with mental handicaps in Atkins v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am by Roy Black
No Island of Sanity: Paula Jones v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The IPSO complaints committee found that the image used by Mail Online gave the “significantly misleading impression” that the dogs had been provided by the charity Hearing Dogs for Deaf People. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am by Ron Coleman
 These young people and their new blogs! [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
First among them, of course, is marginally faster access to relist information, which is what I assume people mean when they mention “Big Data. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:54 am by Steve Erickson
  As Justice Scalia pointed out in his dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Dugger (1987) was written by, of all people, Justice Scalia. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court had yet to announce the constitutional rule, under Atkins v. [read post]