Search for: "People v. Baker (1990)" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 1:30 am by Stephanie Woods, Olswang
Court of Appeal Mrs Baker appealed to the Court of Appeal against Quantum Clothing. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That claim will likely lose because of the rule announced in the 1990 Supreme Court case of Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
One of the questions presented in Fulton is whether the Court should "revisit" (meaning overrule) the Court's much-criticized 1990 decision, Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm by Michael C. Dorf
But in 1990, the Supreme Court ruled in Employment Division v. [read post]