Search for: "People v. Baker (2002)" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Many people assume a criminal case ends upon conviction and sentencing. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:24 am by Steven Eversole
Baker, Feb. 6, 2015, Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals More Blog Entries: Wagner v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
Consultants, Inc., 293 F.3d 708, 712 (4th Cir. 2002) (a case I still discuss in my Internet Law course) and especially Young v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am by Anthony Gaughan
It’s dangerous. . . . people around here are not pros at this sort of thing. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
At the time, that meant the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Apr. 4, 2002) (applying Florida law);GeorgiaChamblin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]