Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:50 am
In a post published yesterday, I explained why Amy Coney Barrett is unlikely to vote to strike down the entire Affordable Care Act in Texas v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm
., Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
First, on Tuesday morning, a motion for Justice Barrett's recusal was filed in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Haaland v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In Barr v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Barrett's Jackson List: The courtroom was jammed. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
(BARRETT, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am
And (for me) the issue of scandal is quite serious here: Others who see the orthodox Catholic judge affirming Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Doctor’s Data, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:52 am
Casey (the case that partially overruled Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:12 pm
Unlike Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh would have placed the burden on the people of faith to justify the policy. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit.Democrats have raised red flags with Barrett’s past writings on abortion, which include her questioning the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
