Search for: "People v. Barton" Results 101 - 120 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[See Barton Beebe & Jeanne Fromer’s empirical work proving this.] [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Transformative use has a stampeding effect, as Barton Beebe says, on the four factor analysis. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ukraine had a justiciable and arguable defence of duress based on Russia’s alleged threats to Ukrainian people or property. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
For example, in Barton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Consultants (2020) (suggesting that the Constitution lets Congress regulate the way people collect debts); Saxe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am by Rory Little
By my count, six other cases granted for the coming Term, in addition to Garcia, are cases with criminal immigration implications: the three consolidated DACA (“deferred action for childhood arrival” cases); two consolidated equitable-tolling cases; and Barton v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 In the Wall Street Journal, Alan Pell Crawford reviews David Barton's attempt at another kind of historical recovery in The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You've Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson (Thomas Nelson). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The most beautiful people stay there. [read post]