Search for: "People v. Baskerville"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
In Attorney-General v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
In the recent opinion of People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
In affirming the conviction, at People v McDaniel (_ NY3d_, 2009 NY Slip Op 06369 [9/1/09]), the Court of Appeals held that Because defense counsel's decision not to seek dismissal of the robbery in the first degree charge for insufficient evidence would not have resulted in a dismissal of that charge (see People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 219-220 [1989]; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 380-381 [1983]), defendant's claim of… [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:31 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:31 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
" But Nussbaum criticized Posner for forgetting these insights in the later case of Baskerville v Culligan International Co (which, for simplicity's sake, could essentially be renamed Pam Beesly v Michael Scott). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
" citing People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 382 (1983) and referencing People v Jackson, 2 AD3d 893, 896 (2003), lv denied 1 NY3d 629 (2004). [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 2:47 pm
" United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
