Search for: "People v. Baxter" Results 81 - 100 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Baxter asked about the "chilling effect on consumers who knew that if they choose to complain they'd suddenly be open game for use in a class action lawsuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
 But whatever happened to the original litigation in Brüstle v Greenpeace? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
One of the male justices (Baxter or George) then asked if it is Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
View the article here07/10/2008The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the minority, to grant the defendant's petition for review in People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:30 am by Tessa Shepperson
A new case – Baxter v Doble & Anor [2023] In 2018 proceedings for possession were brought against a tenant, Mr Baxter, on the basis of serious rent arrears. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Lead class action plaintiff objects when he realizes that the only people getting paid are the lawyers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Here is a crazy quote: "Iqbal will have a more significant impact on American jurisprudence than Marbury v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
The headline of this post is a bit misleading in that, the court will determine only one facet of Jessica's law as implemented in California, it is with respect to civil commitment.7-10-2008 California:The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:03 am by Joanna Schwartz
On October 1, the Supreme Court will consider a petition for certiorari in one of these cases—Baxter v. [read post]