Search for: "People v. Beagle" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was a case management hearing in the case of MBR Acres Limited and others v Free THE MBR BEAGLES QB-2021-003094. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Mr Schofield was awarded £90,000 for an article published by the defendant’s which contained various defamatory and false allegations, including that Mr Schofield was involved in grooming children and/or young people. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
” The ICO released guidance on how data protection obligations can be met while ensuring people still have access to information. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It is the pursuit of hares with sight hounds like lurchers as opposed to the harriers, beagles or bassets involved in hare hunting. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
Noyb claim that X used the political and religious views of their users to determine whether people should or should not see an ad campaign by the EU Commission’s Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Kiwi Farms has had a well-documented history of sparking campaigns of doxing, often targeting LBGTQ+ people. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The company was fined for taking more than 20 billion images of people in the UK found online and on social media to feed its facial recognition database. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
GB News fired host Laurence Fox after more than 8,800 people complained to Ofcom about derogatory remarks he made about a female journalist, Ava Evans. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
” The defendant reviewed the records of 145 people between 17 January and 17 October 2019 “without having a business need to do so. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]