Search for: "People v. Bell (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
’ Third, in considering whether the claim should be struck out under section 8 of the 1996 Act, Master Bell concluded on the same bases that the proceedings had no realistic prospect of success and met the test for summary disposal. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am by Eric Goldman
Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir. 1996) A lot of people—particularly academics who disfavor the law and economics approach popularized at the University of Chicago—don’t like this opinion. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
This should raise alarm bells for the international community and prompt the question: Does the international community accept it? [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Chile Eboe-Usuji
This should raise alarm bells for the international community and prompt the question: Does the international community accept it? [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The recently published Removal of bells from a closed church considers two judgments relating to St James, Church Kirk in the Blackburn Diocese; the earlier case, Re St James Church Kirk [2019] ECC Bla 4, suggested that the designation of “church treasure” was not appropriate in relation to one of the church’s bells [12, 13]. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Epic released a software update for Apple iOS devices on 13 August 2020 making the Fortnite’s virtual currency (called V-Bucks) available for purchase through its own website, in addition to Apple’s App Store, at a 20 per cent discount. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]