Search for: "People v. Benevento"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:19 pm
In the end, a claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the DUI case as held in People v Benevento and People v Prescod. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:58 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
The claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the case as held in People v Benevento. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:02 am
Instead, it holds tight to People v. [read post]
