Search for: "People v. Bernstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
The 1995 Act was enacted to provide remedies for disabled people at the receiving end of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 1:02 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
Lochner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
Skillman Hardware Co., 76 N.J. 45 (1908); People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:54 pm
(David Bernstein) Supreme Court reporter Robert Barnes has a piece today about the role of Lochner v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:34 am
Not only did Lochner represent the victory of small-scale producers over large, politically connected special interests, Bernstein points out, but the ruling led directly to several of the Supreme Court’s most important early decisions in favor of civil rights and civil liberties under the 14th Amendment, including Buchanan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm
Bernstein provides a compelling survey of the history and background of Lochner v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 2:13 pm
People are examining the two candidates. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
(David Bernstein) In Justice Breyer’s dissent in Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
(David Bernstein) I like and respect Yale Law professor Akhil Amar, but his op-ed on the decision invalidating the Obamacare individual mandate is not exactly his best work. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
(David Bernstein) The Times has a nice front-page profile of Randy Barnett, discussing his role in crafting the challenge to the ACA. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:46 am
(David Bernstein) Last week, Eugene blogged about the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:06 am
(David Bernstein) Stumbled across this at goodreads.com. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Miller Bernstein LLP In Lavender v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
(David Bernstein) Rehabilitating Lochner, Conclusion:The longstanding myth of a wildly activist, reactionary Supreme Court imposing a grossly unpopular laissez-faire ideology on the American people on behalf of large corporate interests—with little concern for precedent, constitutional text, or individual or minority rights—is far removed from historical reality. [read post]
