Search for: "People v. Best (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
State lawmakers are generally better positioned than federal lawmakers to ascertain such in-state preferences and implement the best policies based on them. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
There are obvious benefits to clearly articulating existing professional obligations for family lawyers, and there are questions around the best way to do that (i.e.: embedding the guidance in the Model Code or issuing separate ethics opinions). [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  The person most recently tried for contempt of Congress was Rita Lavelle in 1983. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Historically, there was considerable disagreement about whether malicious prosecution claims under section 1983 are best viewed as allegations of Fourth Amendment violations – essentially, as unreasonable seizures – or whether they are best considered as alleged deprivations of due process. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:02 am by SHG
  While I try my best not to make people stupider, some people promoting this simplistic vilification have no qualms about doing so to popularize their position with the terminally cluleless. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  His best-known civil rights cases include the White primary case Nixon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]