Search for: "People v. Bettis"
Results 21 - 40
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
(photo by Betty Lupinacci) Today marks an anniversary that perhaps many people would like to forget: February 3, 1913 was the day that the 16th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:34 am
She has often heard people talking of an action folding; now she knows why ... [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:34 pm
Or the rest of the panel (Judges Betty Fletcher and Randy Smith). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:34 am
The plaintiffs in the case of Betty Nestlehutt and Bruce Nestlehutt v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
Alibaba SAD Scheme Cases Are Always Troubling–Betty’s Best v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
”The ruling, People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
He cited specific black people who had criticized King. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
A Navy helicopter crashes in the Pacific, killing three people. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:51 am
Write Harvey V. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm
In 30 years of practice, I have on numerous occasions offered to FDA leadership the opportunity to meet directly with the people who consumed food that was tainted under the FDA’s watch. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
The style of the case is, Betty Flowers v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am
Supreme Court in 1966 outlaw banning racial intermarriage, in Loving v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Birss J presidedover both the Betty Boop case (about character merchandising) - see the IPKat here - and more recently the Rihanna T shirt case - the IPKat's analysis of the Court of Appeal decision is here.In Birss' view, his decisions did not represent a sea change in the law but rather a willingness to consider the evidence that a significant number of people had been deceived. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
The trial court erred by proceeding with trial without determining whether Disandro’s absence was both “knowing and voluntary,” Justice Manuel Ramirez wrote in People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
Tweet In the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent controversial 5-4 decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Betty Sutton (D., Ohio) introduced a similar proposal in the House. [read post]
