Search for: "People v. Billings" Results 21 - 40 of 9,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2013, 8:32 am by Darius Whelan
 Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 3:58 am by Steve Cornforth
His Bill is undoubtedly borne from grief and a desire to do something to stop very sick people dying if there is something that can be done to save them. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
Seo would have been convicted even if the prosecution had to prove he intended to make make $5 bills to defraud people. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
  This substantively matters, because the safety valve for the latter category is somewhat smaller than the rules that apply to the former.The Court of Appeal decides that the more limited safety valve applies to people whose sentences were not yet final. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:43 pm by The Law Office of Nancy King
The bill seeks to incorporate into law the principles articulated by the California Supreme Court in Ingersoll v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Alfred Brophy
He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am by Graham Smith
On my understanding of the draft Bill that would include blogs and newspaper sites[v]. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am by Graham Smith
On my understanding of the draft Bill that would include blogs and newspaper sites[v]. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
Last year, cookie-cutter bills were introduced in states across the country that would prohibit transgender people from using public restrooms and legalize discrimination against them, but even these efforts only succeeded in two states — and both of those bills have been blocked by federal courts. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
Goolsby gets off on a "technicality".Albeit one that's enshrined in the Bill of Rights:  the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
Others felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and that outlining certain rights would imply that those were the only rights reserved to the people. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
According to the Court, permanent exclusion of named people â€" or even a class of people, such as Communist Party members or people who had given help to the Confederacy â€" from government office may constitute “punishment” and be treated as an unconstitutional Bill of Attainder. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm
 As the bill’s author said, “We literally crafted this legislation to be the arrow in the heart of Roe v. [read post]
The bill anticipates the overturning of these decisions, as signaled by Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]