Search for: "People v. Billington"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:30 am
Terveer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
” In Schroer v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
Is there online chatter from possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:41 am
In September 2008, the D.C. district court held in Schroer v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
Billington, 577 F.Supp.2d 293 (D.D.C. 2008). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
In the case of Schroer v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:51 pm
The Copyright Office’s approved exemptions must then be approved by the Librarian of Congress, currently James Billington. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
Billington, 541 F. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
The new case from a federal district court in Pennsylvania, EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
June 13 will mark the 50th anniversary of Miranda v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
