Search for: "People v. Blake"
Results 41 - 60
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
Blake v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
In National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
Partway through oral argument before the Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:02 pm
In two amicus briefs just filed in appellate courts, we argue that’s a clearly unconstitutional search.[1] The two cases are People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Olson, The Excuse Factory 220–21 (1997). [2] See Volokh, supra note *. [3] See, e.g., Michael Blake, The Discriminating Shopper, 43 San Diego L. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Olson, The Excuse Factory 220–21 (1997). [2] See Volokh, supra note *. [3] See, e.g., Michael Blake, The Discriminating Shopper, 43 San Diego L. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In 1901, in Downes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
"Blake is quoting that to correct people who might think Ginsburg thought that Roe was wrong about the existence of a right to abortion. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
These images spoke of a people being suffocated by a text instead of mastering it. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
Blake[1] Sanford Levinson’s (1988) book Constitutional Faith is a monumental work of constitutional theory. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
As mentioned above, on 18 May 2022 Nicklin J refused trial by jury in the case of Blake and others v Fox. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
When people – especially political people – start pleading “common sense”, to our suspicious minds it always sounds as if they simply can’t be bothered to conduct a rigorous analysis of their own proposals. [read post]
