Search for: "People v. Bolt" Results 201 - 220 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
"A thought bolted into Anna's head, "Oh! [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Michael Scutt
Her practice is founded on the integrated use of IT, rather than most firms where IT is "bolted on" to improve the service (e.g wordprocessors rather than typewriters, email rather than snail mail, websites to tell you where the office is, etc). [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
  If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Proposed changes by the government to the compensation system will attack the rights of injured people and add insult to injury just when they are at their most vulnerable… Read more… I have been reading Bystander JP’s excellent Magistrate’s Blog since ‘time immemorial’. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:00 am
  I found that more information resided in the heads of a few people here and there than in any book. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
We’ve seen attacks targeting people because of their race or religion in places like Pittsburgh, Poway, and El Paso. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
Her interest in the nuts and bolts of procedure would follow her to the Supreme Court, where she was often the first justice to speak up at oral argument and ask questions about possible procedural minefields in a case. [read post]