Search for: "People v. Booker"
Results 41 - 60
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
Dillon v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
US v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Its 5-4 ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
Cory Booker and Rep. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Enter Judge Richard Posner, writing for the 7th Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm
Judge Hardiman opened United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:30 am
US v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am
A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
Holder v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
The Appellate Division, First Department, in People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:13 am
The Georgia Supreme Court in Gunn v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:19 am
Pass. clayton v clayton – does it still apply? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:49 pm
” . . .The Commission also addresses the overcrowding in the federal Bureau of Prisons, which is over-capacity by 37 percent. . . .The report was undertaken pursuant to a directive from Congress to examine mandatory minimum penalties, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Booker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:48 pm
” . . .The Commission also addresses the overcrowding in the federal Bureau of Prisons, which is over-capacity by 37 percent. . . .The report was undertaken pursuant to a directive from Congress to examine mandatory minimum penalties, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Booker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:43 pm
v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), this Court held that mandatory application of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
There, in Tapia v. [read post]
