Search for: "People v. Booth"
Results 41 - 60
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 9:34 am
REV. 1695, 1707 (2011). 2 Katz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:55 am
The Court noted at the outset of its opinion that in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:09 am
U.S. , in which the court held that warrants were required before police could wiretap a call made from a public telephone booth because “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:41 am
In Arguellez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Boyd v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
Kuhlmeier (1988), and Morse v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:47 am
Boothe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
See Graham v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:53 am
(No debate about who wins that guns v. butter debate.) [read post]
29 May 2017, 9:26 pm
” In regards to Ultrasabers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
United States in 1967, when it held that taping a microphone to the top of the phone booth and listening in on a call “searched” the phone booth even though there was no physical intrusion into the booth. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
MacFarlane v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
MacFarlane v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
The police argue that if it were easier for people to sue them, they would spend more time litigating than policing. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
Chief Judge Kozinzki from the Ninth Circuit, dissenting from denial of a motion for en banc hearing in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:51 am
Voters are facing an ugly surprise on their way to the voting booth on Tuesday. [read post]
