Search for: "People v. Bounds (1985)"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
People's exhibit 1B, a 30–round detachable magazine, was attached to the gun when taken into the officer's custody. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale Brawn… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The Statute Restricts Conduct Only When It Is Accompanied by Speech That Conveys a Certain Message Utah bigamy law does not ban married people from having sex with people other than their spouses.[2] It does not ban married people from living with extramarital romantic partners. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Peoples, 29 M.J. 426 (C.M.A. 1990); United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
As Justice Kennedy put it in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:52 pm
The test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
Defendant acknowledges that this claim was rejected by the First Department in People v Ferrer but argues, inter alia, that the decision is so conclusory that it cannot act as a barrier to consideration by this Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
I can well remember pouring over Michael Walzer’s 1985 lectures on Interpretation and Social Criticism, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s 1994 lectures on Common Law Courts in a Civil-Law System. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
However, it is still relevant today and seemed appropriate to post for people to understand some of the issues the justice system faces in wrongful convictions. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am
” In reliance on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Zuckerman v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
The opinion in that case, written by, Chancellor Strine, is bound to have a substantial influence on the ongoing judicial discussion of attorney client privilege in the context of entity representation in general, and more specifically, on the practices of lawyers in managing control of that privilege in the context of corporate transactions. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
I was traveling East bound on Pine Street and did locate the brown 1998 Dodge pick-up traveling West bound on Pine Street from Deming del-Sol. 3. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
Luckily, the Ninth Circuit is not bound to follow the Second Circuit’s interpretations of its own precedent. [read post]
