Search for: "People v. Bowie"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
” In First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
v=vn638D-tB0U [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:25 am
Administrative law — Administrative mandamus — Legislative decision The Redeemed Christian Church of God, Victory Temple (“Victory Temple”) owns an approximately twenty-nine-acre piece of property in Bowie on which it planned to construct a church with a seating capacity of 1,200 to 2,000 people. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 3:16 pm
Tragedy struck earlier this month in Bowie when two people were tragically killed in a Maryland car accident. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
As Part V explains, Bowie knife laws usually applied to other weapons too. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm
NRA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
Allegis Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
” Is Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:35 am
People's Zoning Counsel, appointed by the County Council to protect the public interest and create a full and complete record, was the same attorney who had conducted the settlement and subsequent contract work around the sale of the parcel to LLC. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:43 am
Here's some reading to enjoy on this last day of vacation: Randy Barnett's op-ed on Raich in The Wall Street JournalDahlia Lithwick and Jack Goldsmith's take on the US Att'y firings in Slate An obit of Bowie Kuhn, of the famous Flood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
Silver v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
In Nunn v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
The notion that people inspire songs is not new. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
" "Such appeals to emotion tend to deflect the jurors' attention from issues of fact on the question of guilt or innocence" (People v Bowie, 200 AD2d 511, 513, lv denied 83 NY2d 869), and cause them instead to focus on protecting the victim and correcting an alleged error in the child protective system (see generally People v Ivey, 83 AD2d 788, 789). [read post]
