Search for: "People v. Briggs" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 10:29 am
 Seems the California Supreme Court thinks so, too, and so under Briggs and Van de Kamp v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Hamblen gave the lead judgment, with which Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Briggs agreed. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
Justice Briggs in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division considered this issue in Key & Anor v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:55 am by boston
The Supreme Court made that clear back in 1943 in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:22 am by Kent Scheidegger
  However, they sing a very different tune in court.In the petition filed in the California Supreme Court in Briggs and Van de Kamp v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:01 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Black 'Plant Manager' Loses Unlawful Discharge Claim But States Title VII Salary Bias Claim Briggs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
The twitching was erroneous in Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Briggs last week that had no shake-rattle-and-roll in it at all. [read post]