Search for: "People v. Brown (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The agency deferred a proposed 1985 final monograph because of the blood pressure issue. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
The book greatly influenced Thurgood Marshall, who “referred to the work as ‘the bible’ of Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am by Michael Lowe
In some jurisdictions, if the defendant can demonstrate that it is relevant to the case, the informant’s identity may be revealed (Brown, 1985; Feuer, 2001; Schreiber, 2001). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Monika U. Ehrman
” In 1985, the Supreme Court upheld this approach in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Marumsco Christian Sch., 631 F.2d 1144 (4th Cir. 1980) (race discrimination in admission to schools); Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
” (Notably, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson took the same position against Roe as super precedent.). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
How can we, centuries later, discern and aggregate the intentions of people who disagreed among themselves about key matters and did not anticipate our circumstances? [read post]