Search for: "People v. Brown (1993)"
Results 21 - 40
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
” In re Marriage of Thomas, 608 NE 2d 585 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1993 Court encourage full apportionment of a business in a divorce for the sake of “finality [and] to avoid continued need for court intervention…[.The] division of the property…avoid[s] ongoing association between the parties [and] are goals to be consider[ed] in apportioning such marital assets. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
What is most interesting about Fraley’s data, I think, is its demonstration that at least some people somewhere are always talking about court-packing. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
Brown would write the majority opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 am
This guy won his habeas petition in the Sixth Circuit, but the Supreme Court has reversed and the defendant remains in jail.The case is Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
And yet there is much here of substantial relevance to a world in transformation in which today’s people stand on the shoulders of giants and pretend they are reinventing the world on their own, They are, in fact, merely reprising old, very old, patterns of humans seeking not merely to understand the world around them, but to figure out how to project that meaning authoritatively into a community of believers. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
In these cases, people can carry the same viral load as those who do experience symptoms. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on the confirmation hearings that start today for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Sixty-six percent of ill people were female. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:38 pm
” Koelle v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
Many people are surprised when they find out that domestic abuse does not just mean physical abuse. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:51 am
But rates of registration among Black and Brown people and low-income people are still disproportionately lower, preventing them from exercising their fundamental right to vote. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Under Brown v. [read post]
