Search for: "People v. Buffalo"
Results 61 - 80
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2007, 7:51 am
The Second Circuit held that, assuming the facts stated by the plaintiffs were true, the government had plenary authority at the border, and it was permissible based on the intelligence the government received" Tabbaa v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 7:20 pm
See People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 7:20 pm
See People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
In B-T Two, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Yesterday at noon, with Dave Barshay of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC, sitting in his Jamaica, Queens offices, and I sitting in my Buffalo, New York offices, 127 time- and effort-vested members of the New York no-fault insurance and legal community participated in an open webinar discussion of the background, holding and impact of the New York Court of Appeals' then one-week-old decision in LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
V Signor, 5 NY3d 435, 440 [2005], quoting Buffalo News, 84 NY2d at 492). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:59 am
Buffalo Meat Service, a summary order issued on July 22. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:08 pm
To the oral argument of the Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
In Buckman Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A Counter-Example: Miranda v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Curtin, on the other hand, ordered and supervised desertification of the Buffalo schools, which still pisses some people off. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
Judge NoonanThe Ninth's not buffaloed, Springfield. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
