Search for: "People v. Buffer"
Results 21 - 40
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2020, 9:30 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:49 pm
Nor does Burson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
At the end of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Plaintiff emphasizes that even under the less stringent standard of intermediate scrutiny, the Supreme Court has struck down: a 15-foot buffer zone around people entering and leaving abortion clinics that prevented "communicating a message from a normal conversational distance or handing leaflets to people entering or leaving the clinics who are walking on the public sidewalks," Schenck v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:00 pm
Ware v People’s Counsel for Baltimore County, 2015 WL 4067997 (MD 7/2/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.mdcourts.gov/opinions/cosa/2015/1008s14.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Zoning - Interpretation [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:35 am
Yvon v City of Oceanside, 2016 WL 4238539 (SD CA 8/11/16)Filed under: first amendment [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:24 am
Cartoon Network LP v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 11:37 am
Reno v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
” The confrontations left an officer dead and 79 people injured. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:27 pm
The defendant had been telling people that plaintiff was an infringer; plaintiff sued for defamation. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
These 1,000 feet buffer zones do not work in urban areas. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am
Carey v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
Louis, which last year refused in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In Hill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
In 2023, the US Supreme Court case Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
Every copyright-sensitive Australian is jumping up and down today at the news that the High Court -- the nation's highest -- has given a clear ruling that internet service providers are not liable for authorising copyright infringement by making their services available to people who do infringe copyright. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:13 am
(A subsequent change to the law extended the buffer zone to 500 feet.) [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 11:33 am
This right was recently affirmed by the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
