Search for: "People v. Calderon" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"CPL 450.30 (2) authorizes the People to appeal from a sentence that is invalid as a matter of law" (People v Cosme, 80 NY2d 790, 792), but that statute does not authorize the People to appeal from a youthful offender finding (see generally People v Calderon, 79 NY2d 61, 63-64, 67). [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
“That a group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:10 am by CJLF Staff
  The board also noted that Calderon dropped out his gang many years ago. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Jon Sands
This instruction was required under the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Because, said the Supreme Court in Calderon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]