Search for: "People v. Calderon (1991)" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When, if ever, can a prosecutor properly argue that the type of evidence they normally rely on to obtain convictions is unreliable?
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 In such situations, the prosecutor may be relying on evidence that exists in the case, but characterizes it differently depending on what suits the prosecutor’s theory, even if the arguments made in both cases are  mutually inconsistent (see, e.g., Smith v Groose, 205 F3d 1045, 1050 [8th Cir 2000]; Thompson v Calderon, 120 F3d 1045 [9th Cir 1997], rev’d on other grounds 523 US 538; United States v Salerno, 937 F2d 797, 812 [2nd Cir… [read post]
New York Criminal Defense - http://newyorkcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/
Do I Have a Felony -- or What?
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
Smith, 598 A.2d 268 (Pa. 1991); People v. [read post]
Court-Martial Trial Practice - http://court-martial-ucmj.com/
Who Heeds The Heeding Presumption?
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Grose, 586 So. 2d 196, 198 (Ala. 1991). [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Informal Interviews - Docs For The Goose, Docs For The Gander
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Alcon v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/