Search for: "People v. Carr" Results 221 - 240 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He changed the way people talked about how to read a statute or a constitutional provision. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Our Constitution calls for an ongoing and perpetual government unless modified under the amendment process set forth in Article V of the Constitution or by revolution. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Carr, which, it has been suggested, helped to trigger Frankfurter's stroke and retirement from the Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
One area that many people are concerned with is her business decisions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am by Jeff Gamso
  And, of course, even that rule doesn't apply when the "public safety exception" of New York v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Carr and academic study of the causes and consequences of malapportionment. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
  Even some of the people involved in the drafting of California’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Or, as dissenting FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr observed, “the internet didn’t break. [read post]