Search for: "People v. Carter (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
It is against the rules to restrict fee simple absolute transfers of real estate to certain people for certain periods of time. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
It is against the rules to restrict fee simple absolute transfers of real estate to certain people for certain periods of time. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010 (1996); Schorsch v Moses & Singer, L.L.P., 60 AD3d 557, 557 (1st Dept 2009). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)); Scott v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Biscup, 673 N.E.2d 225, 231 (Ohio App. 1996) (Bexis’s case); Balderston v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Van der Peet, 1996 CanLII 216 (SCC), [1996] 2 SCR 507 31. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
A cop walks into a marijuana grow… In 1996, the People — a majority of the voters — of California passed the first of the medical marijuana laws, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kur: OHIM data go only back to 1996, when it started operating. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Gilpatrick, No. 075653 Sentence of 108 months for conspiring to deprive another of his civil rights and depriving another of his civil rights is affirmed where district courts retained the power to impose a community-confinement condition to supervised release during the period between the enactment of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 and the October 2008 amendments. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Police also. . . . discovered Griffin was the registered owner of a 1996 white four-door Cadillac Sedan DeVille. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [2005] 2 All ER 192; ;[2005] HLR 23 where the requirement to give reasons for rejecting an important aspect of the applicant’s case was set out. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1996, the trio were convicted of murder. [read post]