Search for: "People v. Case" Results 61 - 80 of 57,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 1:43 pm
The Supreme Court decided today by a 5-4 vote in the D.C. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:12 pm by Rick
I suppose you might have read it too, but just in case. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:03 pm by lennyesq
The case asks the simple question, can government officials be held accountable when they coerce people to become informants and retaliate against them when they refuse? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 2:40 pm by Stephen Gillers
  But why the 6 week delay when the People's whole case depends on a single person's credibility? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
Other cases have found individuals liable on the grounds that all those participating in gang violence have been indifferent, or shown a mindless disregard for the possibility of harm being perpetrated against other people. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court observed that the authorities cited by the court in the Smith case do not in fact support the conclusion reached in that case. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:08 pm
Is a defendant who makes six separate telephone calls urging a relative to persuade the prosecution’s chief witness not to testify at trial entitled, under People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm by SO Issues
The court may also consider "reliable hearsay," including the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Hucks, 72 A.D.3d 1608, 1609, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 706; see People v Cunning . . [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Danielle Wild
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
However, review of the constitutionality of New York's Persistent Felony Offender sentencing law is still being sought in the certiorari petition filed on March 10, 2011 in the direct appeal in People v Battles [read post]