Search for: "People v. Chambers" Results 1 - 20 of 2,087
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
Tragically, Justice Arif Iqbal Bhatti, who presided over the case, was later assassinated in his chambers at the Lahore High Court. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
It looks at topics such as people migrating to, within and from the EU, international protection of non-EU nationals, and irregular migration. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR and climate change The Grand Chamber’s ruling in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland [2024] ECHR 304, handed down on Tuesday, seems to have caused a (predictable) storm – and though nothing to do with “religion” specifically, it’s potentially very important in the wider area of human rights law. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Corina Heri
Switzerland case concerned a group of older Swiss women; the territorially and substantively ambitious Duarte Agostinho v. 32 Member States was brought by six Portuguese children and young people; and Carême v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Cloisters Chambers: Discrimination, belief and the “fundamental party rights”: the judgment in Ali v Green Party of England and Wales (i.e. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The Court struck out Dr Theodore Piepenbrock’s claim against the London School of Economics and 51 barristers at Cloisters Chambers, certifying it, and his application to lift a stay on the proceedings, as “totally without merit” [72]. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The problems include state laws that fence out eligible voters, usually people are less affluent and often people of color. [read post]