Search for: "People v. Cheek" Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
They go by various names—Freedom of Information, Right-to-Know, Open Records, or even Sunshine laws—but all share the general concept that because the government is of the people, its documents belong to the people. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
(pop. 4k) arrests man for lightly tapping him on the cheek. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am by jonathanturley
Putting the tongue-in-cheek title aside, the odds are that some people will come to any trial of President Donald Trump. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Southern Command redacted scans of artwork created by people detained at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Catherine Arnold, INFORRM’S Blog: Case Law, Strasbourg: Zemmour v France, Journalist’s conviction for inciting discrimination did not breach Article 10. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
Especially once people start realizing how easy it is to employ this artifice.But Justice Grover says that's the Legislature's problem, not the judiciary's.I'll add only one other thing, which neither opinion mentions, but nonetheless seems obvious to me. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]