Search for: "People v. Cheeks" Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
Especially once people start realizing how easy it is to employ this artifice.But Justice Grover says that's the Legislature's problem, not the judiciary's.I'll add only one other thing, which neither opinion mentions, but nonetheless seems obvious to me. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
At booking a few hours later, a police officer requested a cheek swab from Buza under penalty of law. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am by Bill Araiza
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I think it might've been thinking Marriott Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:03 pm by Arslan Sheikh
If you are unfamiliar with the meme, it is a tongue-in-cheek retort used by young people – often on social media apps like TikTok and Twitter – to criticize older generations for being “out of touch. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:02 pm
  Here is a tongue in cheek recap of some of the more interesting decisions Professor Chemerinsky highlighted. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
The bill (which was still in the envelope), “caused a stinging pain and a red mark on her left side of her face from her chin to her cheek. [read post]