Search for: "People v. Clay" Results 141 - 160 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
According to her the pluralism could allow it were generated among the people the potential for freedom and equality policy. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 The WSJ also has a review of David Clay Large's, Munich 1972: Tragedy, Terror, and Triumph at the Olympic Games and a review of Andrew Gumbel and Roger G. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Justice Gorsuch, has described that method, articulated in the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
Clay, whom you can email here. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 2:00 am by Guest Author
Indeed, one of the Supreme Court’s important cases upholding a congressional delegation of power to the Executive was Field v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
 As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Kirksey is cited in the following article: Charles Calleros & Val Ricks, Kirksey v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]