Search for: "People v. Clay"
Results 141 - 160
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
The ACLU is challenging Section 3 of the misleadingly named Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on behalf of our client Edie Windsor in Windsor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
In order to do so, LucasFilm had provided him with pictures and a clay model on which to base the helmets’ manufacture. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm
Clay Jackson Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
(See, for example: Eysoldt v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Penthouse Bindrim v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
The 6th Circuit opinion in Matthews v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Intellectual Property Watch is a much-valued service to the IP community worldwide -- but it's not sufficiently valued for people to give it adequate funding. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:08 am
” Ward v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
Law Firm Investment Portfolios built on Ron and Toby’s work, a post by V. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
These people know how to live. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
They put few people on the row and killed fewer (NJ killed none, NM one). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
., By: Clay M. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
” [76-77] In McKennitt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
