Search for: "People v. Clayton" Results 81 - 100 of 441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
How can we, centuries later, discern and aggregate the intentions of people who disagreed among themselves about key matters and did not anticipate our circumstances? [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 5:43 pm by Nassiri Law
Clayton County that employment non-discrimination protections should be extended to LGBT people across the country. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm by David Kopel
Rev. 1, 30 (identifying Joyce Malcolm, David Hardy, Clayton Cramer, and me). [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 8:17 am by Tom Smith
Clayton County, which conferred workplace anti-discrimination rights on gay and transgender people and was lauded by liberals and condemned by many conservatives. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:11 am by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County rested on a defective understanding of causation. [read post]