Search for: "People v. Cobb" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
You were ordered committed -- in an ostensibly civil proceeding -- to a state hospital for a year based upon your then-existing psychiatric state. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:08 pm
  Just like people with Section 1983 constitutional claims don't get priority in bankruptcy. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by Administrator
This case stems from the 2007 collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minnesota which killed 13 people. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:33 pm by Russ Bensing
And on Monday, in Kentucky v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:15 am by Joe Patrice
A lot of people aren't familiar with State of Oregon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 8:57 am
Lastly, there are 'Cobbs pleas', given their name after the case People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:26 am by Brian Shiffrin
(People v Agee, 57 AD3d 1486, 1487, lv denied 12 NY3d 813; see People v Becoats, 71 AD3d 1578, 1579, affd 17 NY3d 643, cert denied ___ US ___, 132 S Ct 1970; People v Cobb, 72 AD3d 1565, 1565-1566, lv denied 15 NY3d 803). [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
19 May 2021, 5:45 am
" Finally, the Act tells us that: "In this Act, a couple means – (a) a married couple, or (aa) two people who are civil partners of each other, or (b) two people (whether of different sexes or the same sex) living as partners in an enduring family relationship. [read post]