Search for: "People v. Coca"
Results 81 - 100
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
“It’s not as simple as people think,” he says. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
It also confirmed that similar packaging increases people’s likelihood of buying the product.That’s the nub. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm
ESA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
For example, each picture must have text describing it, so that screen-reader programs can tell blind people what is there. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* Privacy in focus: urban life watching is art in New York StateValentina writes on Foster v Svenson, an Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court decision regarding people taking pictures of their neighbours. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:37 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Shelton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Turning then to Myanmar, this country of 60 million people has just had its sanctions lifted by the US and is now booming, as businesses regard it as one of the last frontiers for IP protection. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am
(I’ll just note that Coca-Cola is counted as IP-intensive in these measures because of its brand value.) [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm
In Pom v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm
In Pom v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
In Clark v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
Supreme Court heard an argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
Supreme Court heard an argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
