Search for: "People v. Coke" Results 101 - 120 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
Both white and black people who married were each guilt of the same crime and subject to the same five years of imprisonment. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:13 pm
If your "good friend" Coke gives you gifts, you may be a more committed salesperson than you'd be if your employer Coke paid you - and yet other people may not discount your advice even if they know about the gifts, whereas they would discount your advice if they thought of you as a paid shill. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:10 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
[for an interesting case where the defendant actually possessed the cocaine but didn’t have dominion and control because his friend owned the coke, see Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
Coke defends against opposition to 'ZERO' trade marksEmma Perot explores Coca-Cola's strategy in defending its ZERO trade marks in a recent USPTO case. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If I buy Coke and reverse engineer the formula and create a new soda that tastes just like Coke and call it Mark’s Cola, Coke has no claim even if consumers think it tastes just like Coke. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by Dave
Gilpin and ors v Legg [2017] EWHC 3220 (Ch) is a gift (at least to land law examiners) that is going to keep on giving. [read post]