Search for: "People v. Collins (1997)" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
Harry Blackmun had his epiphany back in 1994, in Callins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
Kerry Washington plays Professor Anita Hill and and Wendell Pierce plays Judge (later Justice) Thomas.Roe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:01 pm
Whether an employer is covered under a discrimination statute is often a factor of the number of people it employs. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
So here are the approximately 1343 people who were my Verio coworkers between 1997 and 2001. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
State, 685 N.E.2d 700, 702 (Ind. 1997) (quoting Howard v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
There were a number of issues on each appeal, but the principal issue was the Court of Appeal judgment in Brent London Borough Council v Knightley (1997) 29 HLR 857, that the right to apply for a postponement of an order for possession was not an interest in land capable of being inherited, and was therefore a personal right that ended with the death of the tenant/tolerated trespasser. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
There were a number of issues on each appeal, but the principal issue was the Court of Appeal judgment in Brent London Borough Council v Knightley (1997) 29 HLR 857, that the right to apply for a postponement of an order for possession was not an interest in land capable of being inherited, and was therefore a personal right that ended with the death of the tenant/tolerated trespasser. [read post]