Search for: "People v. Commissioners" Results 41 - 60 of 2,326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the current Chair of The Elders) disagreed. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
My remarks today reflect my individual views as a Commissioner of the SEC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:17 am by familoo
There is a slightly more detailed summary of the case on Gordon’s blog (link above), and for those who want to read the full judgment (which has possibly the longest and most unwieldy title I’ve ever seen), you can read it here: Harber v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX – penalties for failure to notify liability to CGT – appellant relied on case law which could not be found on any legal website – whether cases… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
High Commissioner for Human Rights said Israel has not responded to its request for access to Israel and Palestinian territories which would enable it to collect requisite information. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
On further appeal, the High Court held that ACL s 23 does apply to Mr Ho’s contract, with the result that the class action waiver clause was void: Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39. [read post]